<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Duplicate Content … Your Thoughts?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inlineseo.com/blog/2008/07/30/duplicate-content-your-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inlineseo.com/blog/2008/07/30/duplicate-content-your-thoughts/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization &#124; Keyword &#38; Market Research</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Therese</title>
		<link>http://www.inlineseo.com/blog/2008/07/30/duplicate-content-your-thoughts/#comment-1438</link>
		<dc:creator>Therese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inlineseo.com/blog/?p=44#comment-1438</guid>
		<description>I agree. If your goal is to get people to your website, it is definitely &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; just as good to have your articles posted on another website come up first. I have an article on Scribd, for example--&lt;a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/2570187/Religious-Vocation-According-to-Thomas-Aquinas-A-Defense"&gt;Religious Vocation According to Thomas Aquinas&lt;/a&gt;--and maybe 1 in 20 readers come to my website from it. I'm not really in the business of making money, and if people read the articles, it doesn't matter much to me if they don't come to my site.

At present more visitors come to off-site articles than on-site, because of having higher Pagerank. But if I was seeking to maximize visitors, it wouldn't be the best approach to post articles this way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. If your goal is to get people to your website, it is definitely <em>not</em> just as good to have your articles posted on another website come up first. I have an article on Scribd, for example&#8211;<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/2570187/Religious-Vocation-According-to-Thomas-Aquinas-A-Defense">Religious Vocation According to Thomas Aquinas</a>&#8211;and maybe 1 in 20 readers come to my website from it. I&#8217;m not really in the business of making money, and if people read the articles, it doesn&#8217;t matter much to me if they don&#8217;t come to my site.</p>
<p>At present more visitors come to off-site articles than on-site, because of having higher Pagerank. But if I was seeking to maximize visitors, it wouldn&#8217;t be the best approach to post articles this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.inlineseo.com/blog/2008/07/30/duplicate-content-your-thoughts/#comment-1351</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inlineseo.com/blog/?p=44#comment-1351</guid>
		<description>David ... thanks for your comments.  I appreciate your opinion although I disagree with most of what you have written.

Having your article show up first in the search rankings on Ezinearticles vs. on your site are too very different things.  It's not 'almost just as good' unless you think giving away 90% of your traffic to Ezinearticles is a good strategy.  In fact, you're lucky if you can get 1 out of 10 readers of your articles to click through your resource box.

I'm in the business of making MY company money and assets, not ezinearticles.com so I try to keep the content on my sites unique to my sites.  While I do submit articles to the directories, it's not my main strategy as I'd rather invest the time and money into my sites than someone else's.  There are many ways to get links for SEO that don't involve diluting out your content on hundreds of sites other than yours.

There are lots of different ways to do things, but I'm betting if you stopped submiting the same articles on your site to article directories, you'd get higher rankings and more traffic to your pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David &#8230; thanks for your comments.  I appreciate your opinion although I disagree with most of what you have written.</p>
<p>Having your article show up first in the search rankings on Ezinearticles vs. on your site are too very different things.  It&#8217;s not &#8216;almost just as good&#8217; unless you think giving away 90% of your traffic to Ezinearticles is a good strategy.  In fact, you&#8217;re lucky if you can get 1 out of 10 readers of your articles to click through your resource box.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in the business of making MY company money and assets, not ezinearticles.com so I try to keep the content on my sites unique to my sites.  While I do submit articles to the directories, it&#8217;s not my main strategy as I&#8217;d rather invest the time and money into my sites than someone else&#8217;s.  There are many ways to get links for SEO that don&#8217;t involve diluting out your content on hundreds of sites other than yours.</p>
<p>There are lots of different ways to do things, but I&#8217;m betting if you stopped submiting the same articles on your site to article directories, you&#8217;d get higher rankings and more traffic to your pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Leonhardt</title>
		<link>http://www.inlineseo.com/blog/2008/07/30/duplicate-content-your-thoughts/#comment-1350</link>
		<dc:creator>David Leonhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inlineseo.com/blog/?p=44#comment-1350</guid>
		<description>Like most things, this is not a simple black-and-white issue.  In theory, the search engines will filter out duplicate content, although that also depends on how specific the query is.  Longer tail search phrases will often turn up duplicate content.  Big ticket searches are much less likely to show duplicate content.  It is important to note that the search engines do not filter out all instances of an article -0 just the duplicates.  Therefore, the article on your site should still show up.  

But what if it doesn't?  What if it is filtered out and the article at EzineArticles.com shows up in the rankings instead?  From a traffic perspective, that is almost as good, since the link in the resource box points back to your site.  

There is another benefit to be considered from your article showing up all over the Web.  Even if it never ranks for anything in the search engines, on your website or elsewhere, the links it brings in are still pretty powerful.

I really do not see how creating content and then allowing it to be duplicated can hurt a website's rankings.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;David Leonhardts last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.seo-writer.com/blog/2008/09/06/browserank-strategies-quality-content/"&gt;BrowseRank Strategies - Quality Content&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like most things, this is not a simple black-and-white issue.  In theory, the search engines will filter out duplicate content, although that also depends on how specific the query is.  Longer tail search phrases will often turn up duplicate content.  Big ticket searches are much less likely to show duplicate content.  It is important to note that the search engines do not filter out all instances of an article -0 just the duplicates.  Therefore, the article on your site should still show up.  </p>
<p>But what if it doesn&#8217;t?  What if it is filtered out and the article at EzineArticles.com shows up in the rankings instead?  From a traffic perspective, that is almost as good, since the link in the resource box points back to your site.  </p>
<p>There is another benefit to be considered from your article showing up all over the Web.  Even if it never ranks for anything in the search engines, on your website or elsewhere, the links it brings in are still pretty powerful.</p>
<p>I really do not see how creating content and then allowing it to be duplicated can hurt a website&#8217;s rankings.</p>
<p><abbr><em>David Leonhardts last blog post..<a href="http://www.seo-writer.com/blog/2008/09/06/browserank-strategies-quality-content/">BrowseRank Strategies - Quality Content</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.inlineseo.com/blog/2008/07/30/duplicate-content-your-thoughts/#comment-1342</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inlineseo.com/blog/?p=44#comment-1342</guid>
		<description>JBO ... an easy way to improve your linking structure is by adding a sitemap.  There are sitemap generators that will automate this for you.  Search in google</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JBO &#8230; an easy way to improve your linking structure is by adding a sitemap.  There are sitemap generators that will automate this for you.  Search in google</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBO</title>
		<link>http://www.inlineseo.com/blog/2008/07/30/duplicate-content-your-thoughts/#comment-1337</link>
		<dc:creator>JBO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inlineseo.com/blog/?p=44#comment-1337</guid>
		<description>Hi and thanks for the reponse. 

Yes I am talking about ecommerce - I guess the content is a hard one s with 8,000 odd products that come and go it owuld be tough! But I guess I have got to do it!

Perhaps it the products that appear on page 2 or page 3  or page 4 etc of given categories that are not indexed well enough. How to make a better linking structure here I am not sure.

I will take your advice on board though - it is apprecaited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi and thanks for the reponse. </p>
<p>Yes I am talking about ecommerce - I guess the content is a hard one s with 8,000 odd products that come and go it owuld be tough! But I guess I have got to do it!</p>
<p>Perhaps it the products that appear on page 2 or page 3  or page 4 etc of given categories that are not indexed well enough. How to make a better linking structure here I am not sure.</p>
<p>I will take your advice on board though - it is apprecaited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.inlineseo.com/blog/2008/07/30/duplicate-content-your-thoughts/#comment-1328</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inlineseo.com/blog/?p=44#comment-1328</guid>
		<description>JBO ... it sounds like you are talking about an ecommerce site.  You will want to make sure your product descriptions are different from other sites selling similar products.  Try to write as much about the product as possible ... as an estimate I suggest 250 words or more.  If you want to write unique meta descriptions you can, but I don't think this is causing your problem.

Your pages may not be indexed due to poor linking structure, no backlinks, too little content or a variety of other reasons, but probably not the meta description tags.  It's a good idea to change them out, but would be lower on my list of priorities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JBO &#8230; it sounds like you are talking about an ecommerce site.  You will want to make sure your product descriptions are different from other sites selling similar products.  Try to write as much about the product as possible &#8230; as an estimate I suggest 250 words or more.  If you want to write unique meta descriptions you can, but I don&#8217;t think this is causing your problem.</p>
<p>Your pages may not be indexed due to poor linking structure, no backlinks, too little content or a variety of other reasons, but probably not the meta description tags.  It&#8217;s a good idea to change them out, but would be lower on my list of priorities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.inlineseo.com/blog/2008/07/30/duplicate-content-your-thoughts/#comment-1327</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inlineseo.com/blog/?p=44#comment-1327</guid>
		<description>Mike ... thanks!  

To solve the problem, I just would re-write the duplicate paragraphs.  You're not going to see much problem from just a couple of paragraphs, especially if the content is unique to the site.  My main reason for making this post is to educate people who mostly use PLR/scraped content on their sites.  Unique content is best if you want high search engine rankings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike &#8230; thanks!  </p>
<p>To solve the problem, I just would re-write the duplicate paragraphs.  You&#8217;re not going to see much problem from just a couple of paragraphs, especially if the content is unique to the site.  My main reason for making this post is to educate people who mostly use PLR/scraped content on their sites.  Unique content is best if you want high search engine rankings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBO</title>
		<link>http://www.inlineseo.com/blog/2008/07/30/duplicate-content-your-thoughts/#comment-1322</link>
		<dc:creator>JBO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inlineseo.com/blog/?p=44#comment-1322</guid>
		<description>I notice that a lot of my pages with duplicate meta descriptions are not indexed. The meta descriptions are the same as the product is the same other than perhaps a different capacity to the first.

What should Ido about this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I notice that a lot of my pages with duplicate meta descriptions are not indexed. The meta descriptions are the same as the product is the same other than perhaps a different capacity to the first.</p>
<p>What should Ido about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Florida Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.inlineseo.com/blog/2008/07/30/duplicate-content-your-thoughts/#comment-1320</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Florida Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inlineseo.com/blog/?p=44#comment-1320</guid>
		<description>I was helping out a friend's site and noticed 2 paragraphs duplicated on 2 pages. The duplication parsed at 77% for the shorter page. Do you think only that one page could be downgraded, both pages, or the whole site? If the duplication is removed will the page rank again or is it a lost cause?
Thanks.
P.S. Glad to have found your blog from your LBB acquisition.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Old Florida Mikes last blog post..&lt;a href="http://amipost.com/sports/surfing-hurricane-gustav-at-holmes-beach/"&gt;Surfing Hurricane Gustav At Holmes Beach&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was helping out a friend&#8217;s site and noticed 2 paragraphs duplicated on 2 pages. The duplication parsed at 77% for the shorter page. Do you think only that one page could be downgraded, both pages, or the whole site? If the duplication is removed will the page rank again or is it a lost cause?<br />
Thanks.<br />
P.S. Glad to have found your blog from your LBB acquisition.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Old Florida Mikes last blog post..<a href="http://amipost.com/sports/surfing-hurricane-gustav-at-holmes-beach/">Surfing Hurricane Gustav At Holmes Beach</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
